Curse

Servant of Kali · May 24, 2006, 11:17 AM // 11:17

I dont mind not having pandas as pets. I mean come on, do they look like ferocious attacking animals which will fight other people and other pets? I mean panda vs someones tiger. Oh yea.. I know this is a fantasy game but at leasst abit of realism is fine. Imagine rabbit vs any other current pet.

A_Muppet · May 24, 2006, 11:30 AM // 11:30

Using your line of argument, the Moa bird or Crane should be owned by a tiger, as should the Wolf.

S!carius · May 24, 2006, 11:50 AM // 11:50

I like the idea of the panda, but I have to agree that they don't really seem to fit the role of an attacking pet. This may not be how things really are but when I think of a panda, I think of a big, lazy bamboo eating bear. I don't really see an agressive animal.

mega_jamie · May 24, 2006, 12:05 PM // 12:05

Quote:

Originally Posted by A_Muppet

it's pretty pathetic that there isn't even a hint of the critters in the game.

If you start a new ranger, you get to meet one as somebody elses pet.

It doesnt show up in the allies section, and is not tamable.

This annoys me more than anythng else, they have the bloody animal in game, as obviously just a reskinned Elder Bear in this case, as its soo big. Why cant they just reskin the ebar, throw it somewhere in Cantha, and call it a Panda.

Hockster · May 24, 2006, 12:15 PM // 12:15

Chinese laws state that not even virtual pandas can come to any harm. So no pandas as pets.

Retribution X · May 24, 2006, 12:19 PM // 12:19

^^^^That would like mean, Bears would slay everything, and should be level 30...

I agree. It's pissed me off.

Relnor · May 24, 2006, 12:28 PM // 12:28

What is the other part of the Pandan's name...? Oh yeah, thats right, its a Panda Bear. Dispite what many people think, Pandas can be very dangerous...

Oh and its lame that Anet put one in the guide but we can't get it

fiery · May 24, 2006, 01:34 PM // 13:34

Boohoo? Another thread wanting a panda. Go outside and find one, if not in game, making more threads on the subject may not get what you want.

Nevin · May 24, 2006, 02:23 PM // 14:23

Quote:

Originally Posted by fiery

Boohoo? Another thread wanting a panda. Go outside and find one, if not in game, making more threads on the subject may not get what you want.

Good job at making a useless post.

Definitly there needs to be pandas though... This is something that is needed and has the potential to easily be done.

Francis Demeules · May 24, 2006, 02:27 PM // 14:27

Factions Manuscripts P.56-57

Im out.

Lex Talionis · May 24, 2006, 02:31 PM // 14:31

Some ppl just don't bother to look for information. So here's the link + reason why you can't + won't get panda's http://www.guildwarsguru.com/forum/s....php?t=3041837

So stop making thread after thread about wanting a panda. It's just not going to happen.

Fitz Rinley · May 24, 2006, 04:28 PM // 16:28

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hockster

Chinese laws state that not even virtual pandas can come to any harm. So no pandas as pets.

No! No! That is perfect. I agree that pandas should be pets and we follow the law. Panda bear pets immune to damage. That is perfect!

ROFL.

When we get the Ausi expansion maybe we can get Koala Bear pets. They may look cuddly but DON'T go asking to check their teeth. That little mouth opens like a gator.

Sun Bears are Asian (Russian), perhaps they could be added to the Kurzic region.

Fitz